Triple
T4551508
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Portugal and Spain |
E110173
|
entity |
| Predicate | wereMajorColonialPowers |
P3075
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Portugal and Spain, wereMajorColonialPowers, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wereMajorColonialPowers Context triple: [Portugal and Spain, wereMajorColonialPowers, true]
-
A.
wasColonialPower
chosen
Indicates that one entity historically exercised colonial control or dominance over another entity.
-
B.
colonialPowerInvolved
Indicates that a colonial power is involved in, influences, or exerts control over the referenced situation, event, or relationship.
-
C.
hasColonialHistoryWith
Indicates that one entity has a historical relationship of colonization or being colonized involving the other entity.
-
D.
colonialPowerOpposed
Indicates that one colonial power actively resisted, conflicted with, or worked against another colonial power or its interests.
-
E.
colonialPowerOfOrigin
Indicates the colonial state or empire from which a colony or formerly colonized territory originated or was governed.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4412524c8190be5bcc9ddee91848 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd57f7b9748190af29d02fc77b02e0 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd5223423c81908317351b58cff5f5 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:05 p.m.