Triple
T4549727
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sebastián Ramírez |
E110131
|
entity |
| Predicate | softwareDesignGoal |
P49728
|
FINISHED |
| Object | performance |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: performance | Statement: [Sebastián Ramírez, softwareDesignGoal, performance]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: softwareDesignGoal Context triple: [Sebastián Ramírez, softwareDesignGoal, performance]
-
A.
engineeringGoal
chosen
Indicates that an entity has a specific engineering-related objective, target, or desired outcome it is intended to achieve or support.
-
B.
designPhilosophy
Indicates the guiding principles, values, or conceptual approach that shape how something is designed or created.
-
C.
reasonForDesign
Indicates that one entity serves as the explanation, motivation, or justification for why another entity was designed or created in a particular way.
-
D.
strategicGoal
Indicates that one entity represents a long-term objective or desired outcome that another entity is intentionally aiming to achieve or align actions toward.
-
E.
designProcess
Indicates the sequence of actions, decisions, and iterations involved in creating, developing, or refining a design.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4412524c8190be5bcc9ddee91848 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd57f3f8348190868e274ac4df87ce |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd5223423c81908317351b58cff5f5 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:05 p.m.