Triple
T454338
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board |
E7199
|
entity |
| Predicate | reviewStandard |
P3850
|
FINISHED |
| Object | review of decisions of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: review of decisions of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs | Statement: [Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board, reviewStandard, review of decisions of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reviewStandard Context triple: [Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board, reviewStandard, review of decisions of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs]
-
A.
standardOfReview
chosen
Indicates the level and type of scrutiny an authority (such as a court or reviewer) applies when evaluating a prior decision, action, or finding.
-
B.
reviewedBy
Indicates that an item, work, or action has been examined and evaluated by a specific agent or reviewer.
-
C.
editorialStandard
Indicates that one entity defines, follows, or enforces a particular set of editorial rules, guidelines, or quality criteria in relation to another entity or content.
-
D.
peerReview
Indicates that one entity evaluates, critiques, or validates the work or performance of another entity, typically as an equal in expertise or status.
-
E.
reviewsDecisionsFrom
Indicates that one entity examines and evaluates the decisions made by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7e4676c81909ea0dbdecac0687c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ef87cc7c8190a0fec933457821e2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2ede4de008190b5a6c159e741522e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.