Triple

T453941
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Blessed Sacrament E7190 entity
Predicate mayAlsoReferTo P2819 FINISHED
Object consecrated Eucharistic wine LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: consecrated Eucharistic wine | Statement: [Blessed Sacrament, mayAlsoReferTo, consecrated Eucharistic wine]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayAlsoReferTo
Context triple: [Blessed Sacrament, mayAlsoReferTo, consecrated Eucharistic wine]
  • A. alsoUsedIn
    Indicates that something is additionally employed, applied, or present in another context, setting, or use case beyond the primary one.
  • B. canAlsoBe chosen
    Indicates that something has an additional possible state, role, or classification beyond its primary one.
  • C. alsoServesAs
    Indicates that one entity has an additional role, function, or identity that it fulfills simultaneously with its primary one.
  • D. alsoUsedBy
    Indicates that something is additionally utilized or employed by another entity, beyond any primary or previously mentioned user.
  • E. mayResultIn
    Indicates that one entity has the potential to cause, lead to, or bring about another entity or outcome, without guaranteeing that it will occur.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7e4676c81909ea0dbdecac0687c completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ef866e848190a5b700250ec56256 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2ede4de008190b5a6c159e741522e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.