Triple
T4495712
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Spišská Nová Ves |
E100688
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTwinTown |
P919
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Suceava |
E406724
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Suceava | Statement: [Spišská Nová Ves, hasTwinTown, Suceava]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Suceava Context triple: [Spišská Nová Ves, hasTwinTown, Suceava]
-
A.
Suceava
chosen
Suceava is a historic city in northeastern Romania that once served as the capital of the medieval Principality of Moldavia and is today an important cultural and economic center of the Bukovina region.
-
B.
Bârlad
Bârlad is a town in eastern Romania, historically part of the Moldavia region and known as a local cultural and educational center.
-
C.
Râmnicu Vâlcea
Râmnicu Vâlcea is a city in south-central Romania, located on the Olt River and serving as the capital of Vâlcea County.
-
D.
Mediaș
Mediaș is a historic town in central Romania’s Transylvania region, known for its well-preserved medieval architecture and long-standing Transylvanian Saxon heritage.
-
E.
Băilești
Băilești is a town in southwestern Romania, in Dolj County, known as a local agricultural and commercial center.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43cdf15081909a4fa2585ff63b3e |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd56bde14c819091d42839a46291d0 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:16 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bd6f8190e88190aec651ac9fe9ef92 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:02 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1 p.m.