Triple

T4494932
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject River Mease E100670 entity
Predicate hasEcologicalStatus P18514 FINISHED
Object high ecological value LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high ecological value | Statement: [River Mease, hasEcologicalStatus, high ecological value]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEcologicalStatus
Context triple: [River Mease, hasEcologicalStatus, high ecological value]
  • A. ecologicalStatus chosen
    Indicates the condition or health of an ecosystem or environment, often in terms of its quality, integrity, or degree of disturbance.
  • B. hasEcology
    Indicates that an entity has a particular ecological context, such as its habitat, environmental role, or interactions within an ecosystem.
  • C. isEcologicalZone
    Indicates that one entity functions as, or is classified as, an ecological zone in relation to another entity.
  • D. containsEcologicalTypes
    Indicates that one entity includes or encompasses specific ecological types or categories within it.
  • E. environmentalProtectionStatus
    Indicates the level or type of legal or policy-based protection afforded to an entity due to environmental conservation or preservation considerations.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43cdf15081909a4fa2585ff63b3e completed March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd5572c60881909101b4e65dd5de06 completed March 20, 2026, 2:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd521671688190bc655d25fa77eba2 completed March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1 p.m.