Triple
T4493129
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gödel's ontological proof |
E100625
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasVariant |
P455
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dana Scott's version of Gödel's ontological argument |
E100625
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dana Scott's version of Gödel's ontological argument | Statement: [Gödel's ontological proof, hasVariant, Dana Scott's version of Gödel's ontological argument]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Dana Scott's version of Gödel's ontological argument Context triple: [Gödel's ontological proof, hasVariant, Dana Scott's version of Gödel's ontological argument]
-
A.
Gödel's ontological proof
chosen
Gödel's ontological proof is a formal, modal-logic-based argument for the existence of God that rigorously develops and refines earlier ontological arguments within a precise axiomatic framework.
-
B.
Kripke fixed-point theory of truth
The Kripke fixed-point theory of truth is a semantic framework developed by Saul Kripke that uses partial truth predicates and fixed points to consistently handle self-referential sentences and semantic paradoxes like the liar paradox.
-
C.
Tarski's undefinability theorem
Tarski's undefinability theorem is a fundamental result in mathematical logic showing that, in sufficiently strong formal systems, the notion of truth for the language of the system cannot be defined within that same language.
-
D.
Löb's theorem
Löb's theorem is a fundamental result in mathematical logic that characterizes when a sufficiently strong formal system can prove statements about its own provability, closely refining the insights of Gödel’s incompleteness theorems.
-
E.
New Foundations for Mathematical Logic
New Foundations for Mathematical Logic is W.V.O. Quine’s influential essay proposing an alternative set theory, known as "New Foundations," aimed at resolving paradoxes while preserving a broad, intuitive universe of sets.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43cdf15081909a4fa2585ff63b3e |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd5570ba0881908f5fb4f8d0730e64 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:10 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bd67b40fd4819098636b6f29304312 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:28 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 12:59 p.m.