Triple
T4492640
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | On Referring |
E100614
|
entity |
| Predicate | critiquesTheory |
P50921
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Russell's theory of descriptions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Russell's theory of descriptions | Statement: [On Referring, critiquesTheory, Russell's theory of descriptions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: critiquesTheory Context triple: [On Referring, critiquesTheory, Russell's theory of descriptions]
-
A.
critiquesConcept
chosen
Indicates that one entity analyzes, evaluates, or challenges the ideas or principles represented by another entity.
-
B.
aimsToCritique
Indicates an intention to analyze and point out faults, limitations, or weaknesses in something.
-
C.
criticizedConstruct
Indicates that one entity expressed disapproval or negative judgment about another entity’s constructed work, idea, or creation.
-
D.
viewOnTheories
Indicates a relationship where an entity holds or expresses a particular perspective, stance, or opinion regarding one or more theories.
-
E.
usedToCritique
Indicates that something is employed as a means to analyze, evaluate, or express disapproval of something else.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43cdf15081909a4fa2585ff63b3e |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd556f99b48190ae60506a35b43c29 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd5213e3d0819094b026989e686f01 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 12:59 p.m.