Triple
T4486530
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act |
E107252
|
entity |
| Predicate | constitutionalChallenge |
P1122
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Eldred v. Ashcroft |
E446207
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Eldred v. Ashcroft | Statement: [Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, constitutionalChallenge, Eldred v. Ashcroft]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Eldred v. Ashcroft Context triple: [Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, constitutionalChallenge, Eldred v. Ashcroft]
-
A.
Eldred v. Ashcroft
chosen
Eldred v. Ashcroft is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of extending copyright terms, affirming Congress’s broad power over copyright duration.
-
B.
Van Orden v. Perry
Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
-
C.
County of Allegheny v. ACLU
County of Allegheny v. ACLU is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by addressing the constitutionality of religious holiday displays on government property.
-
D.
NFIB v. Sebelius
NFIB v. Sebelius is the landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the Affordable Care Act, notably ruling that its individual mandate could be sustained under Congress’s taxing power.
-
E.
King v. Burwell
King v. Burwell is a landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the availability of federal tax credits for health insurance purchased on exchanges under the Affordable Care Act.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43f84f788190a1383579c4a595be |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd52a958288190974b292f54a0e045 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bd6f7f33d08190a247e956193c7eef |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:02 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 12:59 p.m.