Triple

T4473620
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Black Bourton E98553 entity
Predicate hasTraditionalCotswoldCharacter P56746 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Black Bourton, hasTraditionalCotswoldCharacter, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTraditionalCotswoldCharacter
Context triple: [Black Bourton, hasTraditionalCotswoldCharacter, true]
  • A. traditionallyHouses
    Indicates that one entity has historically or customarily served as the location or container for another entity.
  • B. traditionCharacteristic
    Indicates that a particular quality, feature, or attribute is characteristic of, or typically associated with, a given tradition.
  • C. traditionallyBuiltOver
    Indicates that one entity has been constructed on top of another in a manner consistent with long-established or customary building practices.
  • D. hasTraditionalCountyStatus
    Indicates that an entity holds the official or customary status of being recognized as a traditional county within a given jurisdiction.
  • E. isTraditional
    Indicates that something adheres to long-established customs, practices, or norms rather than modern or innovative ones.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3454b4ae481908967426dd37284d6 completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b35728ed508190ba0e882fa62d8848 completed March 13, 2026, 12:15 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b3563d63008190816e37027e761375 completed March 13, 2026, 12:11 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69b35727a8ac819090420bd3e2cfbcf1 completed March 13, 2026, 12:15 a.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:35 p.m.