Triple

T4470307
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ACKTR E98477 entity
Predicate usesTrustRegion P56720 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [ACKTR, usesTrustRegion, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesTrustRegion
Context triple: [ACKTR, usesTrustRegion, true]
  • A. lastTrustTerritory
    Indicates that an entity is the final remaining trust territory associated with another entity (such as an administering authority or system of governance).
  • B. requiresConfidenceOf
    Indicates that one entity can only proceed, function, or be accepted if it has sufficient trust, assurance, or belief in the reliability or correctness of another entity.
  • C. typeOfTrust
    Indicates the specific kind or category of trust that characterizes the relationship between entities.
  • D. trustAnchoredVia
    Indicates that a relationship of trust is established or justified through a specific intermediary or anchoring mechanism (such as a trusted authority, key, or certificate).
  • E. trustModel
    Indicates that one entity relies on or has confidence in the reliability, integrity, or performance of another entity or system.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3454b4ae481908967426dd37284d6 completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b356fb69a0819099f0005779f4fcac completed March 13, 2026, 12:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b3563bf4f8819081726cde3a34460b completed March 13, 2026, 12:11 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69b356f9afc48190acb50c45a310e072 completed March 13, 2026, 12:14 a.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:34 p.m.