Triple
T4470259
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | A2C |
E98476
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesUpdateType |
P55274
|
FINISHED |
| Object | synchronous gradient updates |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: synchronous gradient updates | Statement: [A2C, usesUpdateType, synchronous gradient updates]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesUpdateType Context triple: [A2C, usesUpdateType, synchronous gradient updates]
-
A.
usesUpdateScheme
chosen
Indicates that one entity applies or operates according to a particular update scheme or updating method defined by another entity.
-
B.
qualityUpdateType
Indicates the specific kind of change or modification applied to an entity’s quality or quality-related status.
-
C.
isUpdated
Indicates that an entity has been modified or brought to a more recent state compared to its previous version or a reference point.
-
D.
updated
Indicates that an entity has been modified or brought to a more recent state compared to its previous version or status.
-
E.
changeType
Indicates the specific kind or category of modification that has occurred to an entity or relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3454b4ae481908967426dd37284d6 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b356fb69a0819099f0005779f4fcac |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b3563bf4f8819081726cde3a34460b |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:11 a.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:34 p.m.