Triple
T4470252
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | A2C |
E98476
|
entity |
| Predicate | advantageDefinition |
P56716
|
FINISHED |
| Object | A(s,a) = Q(s,a) - V(s) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: A(s,a) = Q(s,a) - V(s) | Statement: [A2C, advantageDefinition, A(s,a) = Q(s,a) - V(s)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: advantageDefinition Context triple: [A2C, advantageDefinition, A(s,a) = Q(s,a) - V(s)]
-
A.
notableAdvantage
Indicates that one entity possesses a significant benefit, edge, or favorable quality over another entity or in a given context.
-
B.
disadvantage
Indicates that one entity is in a less favorable, weaker, or hindered position relative to another in a given context.
-
C.
benefits
Indicates that one entity gains an advantage, improvement, or positive outcome as a result of another entity or action.
-
D.
exclusiveBenefit
Indicates that a benefit is provided to one party or group in a way that excludes others from receiving the same advantage.
-
E.
contractingAdvantage
Indicates that one party has a favorable position, benefit, or leverage over another in the process of forming or negotiating a contract.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3454b4ae481908967426dd37284d6 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b356fb69a0819099f0005779f4fcac |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b3563bf4f8819081726cde3a34460b |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:11 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69b356f9afc48190acb50c45a310e072 |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:14 a.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:34 p.m.