Triple

T4466074
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Coat of arms of Montserrat E98379 entity
Predicate musicalSymbol P56669 FINISHED
Object harp LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: harp | Statement: [Coat of arms of Montserrat, musicalSymbol, harp]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: musicalSymbol
Context triple: [Coat of arms of Montserrat, musicalSymbol, harp]
  • A. musicalAttribute
    Indicates a relationship where a musical work, performance, or element is characterized by a specific musical property or quality (such as tempo, key, style, or mood).
  • B. musicalFunction
    Indicates the specific role or function an entity plays within a musical context, such as its harmonic, structural, or performative purpose in a piece or performance.
  • C. musicElement
    Indicates a relationship where something functions as a component or structural unit within a piece of music or musical composition.
  • D. musicInstrumentation
    Indicates the specific instruments or instrumental forces used to perform a piece of music.
  • E. musicalMode
    Indicates the specific tonal framework or scale system (mode) in which a piece of music or musical passage is organized.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3454a7c608190944f5455c8031d73 completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b356fb69a0819099f0005779f4fcac completed March 13, 2026, 12:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b3563bf4f8819081726cde3a34460b completed March 13, 2026, 12:11 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69b356f9afc48190acb50c45a310e072 completed March 13, 2026, 12:14 a.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:34 p.m.