Triple

T4449960
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sansei E96382 entity
Predicate hasHeritageLanguage P6149 FINISHED
Object Japanese LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Japanese | Statement: [Sansei, hasHeritageLanguage, Japanese]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHeritageLanguage
Context triple: [Sansei, hasHeritageLanguage, Japanese]
  • A. hasLinguisticHeritage
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with the linguistic background, tradition, or ancestry of another entity.
  • B. heritageLanguage chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the ancestral or culturally inherited language associated with another entity.
  • C. hasLanguageOfSurroundingCountries
    Indicates that an entity uses or includes the languages commonly spoken in the countries that geographically surround it.
  • D. isCulturalLanguageOf
    Indicates that a language serves as a primary medium of cultural expression, identity, and heritage for a particular group, community, or region.
  • E. hasRepresentativeLanguage
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a language that serves as its primary or officially recognized means of representation or communication.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b345415ba481908df738e7174448ba completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b355d5975c8190bfe8a2d5d2dbf075 completed March 13, 2026, 12:09 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b34f62c180819097ced38da2052207 completed March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:32 p.m.