Triple
T444430
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ethics (Spinoza) |
E10185
|
entity |
| Predicate | centralDoctrine |
P4306
|
FINISHED |
| Object | substance monism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: substance monism | Statement: [Ethics (Spinoza), centralDoctrine, substance monism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: centralDoctrine Context triple: [Ethics (Spinoza), centralDoctrine, substance monism]
-
A.
keyDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that something is a central or foundational doctrine within a belief system, organization, or theoretical framework.
-
B.
militaryDoctrine
Indicates that one entity embodies, follows, or defines the strategic military principles, tactics, and operational guidelines used by another entity.
-
C.
stateDoctrine
Indicates that a state or government officially endorses, promotes, or is guided by a particular doctrine, ideology, or set of principles.
-
D.
centralIn
Indicates that one entity occupies a central or most important position within another entity, context, or structure.
-
E.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e8465ef481909655c681b01e2986 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ef459800819083cd9eef3e7b5295 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2edde2b9c8190bd20b582eb4c5065 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m.