Triple
T4437642
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hirabayashi v. United States |
E95689
|
entity |
| Predicate | holding |
P2237
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
The Supreme Court held that the curfew order was a valid exercise of the war powers of Congress and the President.
This entity is the central holding in the 1943 Supreme Court case Hirabayashi v. United States, which upheld a World War II-era curfew imposed on Japanese Americans as constitutional under the federal government’s war powers.
|
E440272
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Supreme Court held that the curfew order was a valid exercise of the war powers of Congress and the President. | Statement: [Hirabayashi v. United States, holding, The Supreme Court held that the curfew order was a valid exercise of the war powers of Congress and the President.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Supreme Court held that the curfew order was a valid exercise of the war powers of Congress and the President. Context triple: [Hirabayashi v. United States, holding, The Supreme Court held that the curfew order was a valid exercise of the war powers of Congress and the President.]
-
A.
Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit
Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit is the outcome of the landmark administrative law case Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, in which the U.S. Supreme Court limited courts’ ability to impose additional procedural requirements on federal agencies beyond those mandated by statute or the Constitution.
-
B.
Second War Powers Act of 1942
The Second War Powers Act of 1942 was a major U.S. World War II statute that greatly expanded federal authority over the economy, production, and resources to support the war effort.
-
C.
War Powers Act of 1941
The War Powers Act of 1941 was a World War II-era U.S. law that granted President Franklin D. Roosevelt broad emergency authority to reorganize the executive branch and mobilize the nation’s resources for war.
-
D.
U.S. War Powers Resolution
The U.S. War Powers Resolution is a 1973 federal law intended to limit the president’s ability to commit U.S. armed forces to hostilities without congressional authorization, enacted in response to concerns raised by the Vietnam War.
-
E.
ACT Supreme Court
The ACT Supreme Court is the highest court in the Australian Capital Territory, handling serious criminal and civil cases as well as appeals from lower courts in the territory.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: The Supreme Court held that the curfew order was a valid exercise of the war powers of Congress and the President. Triple: [Hirabayashi v. United States, holding, The Supreme Court held that the curfew order was a valid exercise of the war powers of Congress and the President.]
Generated description
This entity is the central holding in the 1943 Supreme Court case Hirabayashi v. United States, which upheld a World War II-era curfew imposed on Japanese Americans as constitutional under the federal government’s war powers.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Supreme Court held that the curfew order was a valid exercise of the war powers of Congress and the President. Target entity description: This entity is the central holding in the 1943 Supreme Court case Hirabayashi v. United States, which upheld a World War II-era curfew imposed on Japanese Americans as constitutional under the federal government’s war powers.
-
A.
Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit
Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit is the outcome of the landmark administrative law case Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, in which the U.S. Supreme Court limited courts’ ability to impose additional procedural requirements on federal agencies beyond those mandated by statute or the Constitution.
-
B.
Second War Powers Act of 1942
The Second War Powers Act of 1942 was a major U.S. World War II statute that greatly expanded federal authority over the economy, production, and resources to support the war effort.
-
C.
War Powers Act of 1941
The War Powers Act of 1941 was a World War II-era U.S. law that granted President Franklin D. Roosevelt broad emergency authority to reorganize the executive branch and mobilize the nation’s resources for war.
-
D.
U.S. War Powers Resolution
The U.S. War Powers Resolution is a 1973 federal law intended to limit the president’s ability to commit U.S. armed forces to hostilities without congressional authorization, enacted in response to concerns raised by the Vietnam War.
-
E.
ACT Supreme Court
The ACT Supreme Court is the highest court in the Australian Capital Territory, handling serious criminal and civil cases as well as appeals from lower courts in the territory.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3453ea2b48190a26f154b3b8fece5 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b3558c75948190875a5fb10eac0597 |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:08 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b6137960908190814cbdf0b4e56542 |
completed | March 15, 2026, 2:03 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69b61439a86c8190849c5af718ddc647 |
completed | March 15, 2026, 2:06 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69b614d6106c81908a601f540622f934 |
completed | March 15, 2026, 2:09 a.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:31 p.m.