Triple
T4436637
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | G.729 |
E95665
|
entity |
| Predicate | annexHFeature |
P182
|
FINISHED |
| Object | variable bit-rate coding |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: variable bit-rate coding | Statement: [G.729, annexHFeature, variable bit-rate coding]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: annexHFeature Context triple: [G.729, annexHFeature, variable bit-rate coding]
-
A.
hasFeature
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or includes a particular characteristic, attribute, or component.
-
B.
hasFeatureCode
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific feature identifier or code that characterizes one of its properties or attributes.
-
C.
supportsFeature
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
-
D.
mayIncludeFeature
Indicates that one entity is allowed or able to contain, incorporate, or be associated with a particular feature.
-
E.
technologicalFeature
Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a specific technological capability, component, or functionality in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3453ea2b48190a26f154b3b8fece5 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b3558b1d4481909060ede5e0ded4bc |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b34f6078cc8190831b89f404198cc5 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:31 p.m.