Triple

T4426771
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cuyahoga River E95227 entity
Predicate hasImprovedWaterQuality P25366 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Cuyahoga River, hasImprovedWaterQuality, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasImprovedWaterQuality
Context triple: [Cuyahoga River, hasImprovedWaterQuality, yes]
  • A. waterQualityImprovedAfter chosen
    Indicates that the quality of water in a given context has become better following a specified event, time, or intervention.
  • B. hasWaterQualityHistory
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a record or series of records describing changes or measurements of its water quality over time.
  • C. hasWaterQualityProgram
    Indicates that an entity implements or participates in a program aimed at monitoring, managing, or improving water quality.
  • D. waterQualityProtection
    Indicates efforts, measures, or responsibilities aimed at preserving or improving the cleanliness, safety, and ecological integrity of water resources.
  • E. waterQualityIssues
    Indicates that there are problems or concerns with the condition, safety, or suitability of a water source.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3453c2a0c8190926b574c90766db9 completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b3554fb28081909018eaecc0c5c230 completed March 13, 2026, 12:07 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b34f5eabe88190a12b244ea71e46d6 completed March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:30 p.m.