Triple
T4426173
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Emergency Alert System (United States) |
E95214
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | emergency communication system |
C3917
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: emergency communication system Context triple: [Emergency Alert System (United States), instanceOf, emergency communication system]
-
A.
public safety communications agency
A public safety communications agency is an organization that manages and coordinates emergency and non-emergency communication services between the public and first responders to ensure timely and effective incident response.
-
B.
global communication system
A global communication system is an interconnected network of technologies, protocols, and infrastructures that enables real-time exchange of information across the world regardless of geographic location.
-
C.
public warning system
chosen
A public warning system is an organized infrastructure of technologies, protocols, and communication channels designed to rapidly alert and inform the public about imminent or ongoing emergencies and hazards.
-
D.
emergency management agency
An emergency management agency is an organization responsible for preparing for, coordinating, and responding to natural or human-made disasters to protect people, property, and the environment.
-
E.
emergency legislation
Emergency legislation is a special category of law enacted rapidly, often with expedited procedures and temporary scope, to address urgent or unforeseen crises requiring immediate governmental action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3453c2a0c8190926b574c90766db9 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:30 p.m.