Triple
T4425239
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PettingZoo |
E95191
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsAgents |
P55916
|
FINISHED |
| Object | cooperative agents |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: cooperative agents | Statement: [PettingZoo, supportsAgents, cooperative agents]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsAgents Context triple: [PettingZoo, supportsAgents, cooperative agents]
-
A.
supportedAs
Indicates that one entity is accepted, recognized, or treated as being in the role, type, or representation of another entity.
-
B.
hasAgent
Indicates that an action or event is carried out or initiated by a particular agent.
-
C.
supportsProduct
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, compatibility, or necessary resources for the operation, use, or maintenance of a specified product.
-
D.
supportedIn
Indicates that one entity is valid, applicable, or functionally enabled within the context, environment, platform, or scope defined by another entity.
-
E.
supportsUse
Indicates that one entity enables, allows, or is compatible with the use or operation of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3453c2a0c8190926b574c90766db9 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b3554e40ec8190982acc0948da2f42 |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b34f5eabe88190a12b244ea71e46d6 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69b3505a87b4819083fbbd58870e520b |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:46 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:30 p.m.