Triple
T4411397
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Japanese American internment |
E94859
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCourtCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ex parte Endo |
E95690
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ex parte Endo | Statement: [Japanese American internment, relatedCourtCase, Ex parte Endo]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ex parte Endo Context triple: [Japanese American internment, relatedCourtCase, Ex parte Endo]
-
A.
Ex parte Endo
chosen
Ex parte Endo is a landmark 1944 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the government could not continue to detain a loyal American citizen of Japanese ancestry in a World War II internment camp.
-
B.
Yamashita v. Styer
Yamashita v. Styer is a landmark 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of Japanese General Tomoyuki Yamashita and established the controversial "command responsibility" doctrine in international law.
-
C.
Ex parte Young
Ex parte Young is a landmark 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created a legal fiction allowing suits in federal court against state officials to stop ongoing violations of federal law, despite state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.
-
D.
Chiafalo v. Washington
Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
-
E.
United States v. Kagama
United States v. Kagama is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority over crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations, reinforcing congressional power in Indian affairs.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b34539638c8190abfea3eb29425210 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b354e656dc819093ca8395d7334006 |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:05 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b5f6131de08190968259a0be73cd3f |
completed | March 14, 2026, 11:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:29 p.m.