Triple

T43930
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject West Germany E862 entity
Predicate securityAllianceRole P1904 FINISHED
Object key NATO member LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: key NATO member | Statement: [West Germany, securityAllianceRole, key NATO member]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityAllianceRole
Context triple: [West Germany, securityAllianceRole, key NATO member]
  • A. hasRole
    Indicates that an entity occupies, performs, or is assigned a specific role or function in relation to another entity or context.
  • B. securityAgency
    Indicates that one entity functions as a security agency responsible for protection, surveillance, or enforcement activities in relation to another entity.
  • C. securityProgram
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, participates in, or is governed by a security program, such as a set of policies, controls, or initiatives related to safety or protection.
  • D. securityMechanism
    Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a means or method to protect another entity from threats, vulnerabilities, or unauthorized actions.
  • E. allianceMember chosen
    Indicates that an entity is a member or participant in a specific alliance or coalition.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a247a8f6c08190bac804906d62ed5a completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a24c083ad081909c1122c8fb29efdc completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:59 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24aba9a2c81909f769a8f22e30c92 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:46 a.m.