Triple
T4389526
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dr. Cavor |
E99326
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasInventionProperty |
P56327
|
FINISHED |
| Object | gravity-defying substance |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: gravity-defying substance | Statement: [Dr. Cavor, hasInventionProperty, gravity-defying substance]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInventionProperty Context triple: [Dr. Cavor, hasInventionProperty, gravity-defying substance]
-
A.
hasKeyInvention
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a primary or crucial invention.
-
B.
inventionType
Indicates the specific category or kind of invention that characterizes the relationship between an invention and its type.
-
C.
ownsIntellectualProperty
Indicates that one entity holds legal ownership rights over the intellectual property created, produced, or associated with another entity.
-
D.
hasPatentGrant
Indicates that a patent grant exists conferring legal protection or rights to an entity for a specific invention or intellectual property.
-
E.
wasInventedBy
Indicates that something (typically an object, concept, or process) was created or brought into existence by a particular inventor or originator.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3454f739481909ff6c28331f0c0b9 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b35282cb2c8190856da20bb87e88ff |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b34f572efc8190bad1e5078cbcb75a |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69b3501834448190bedf775a80da4778 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:19 p.m.