Triple
T4386694
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Matrix Revolutions |
E99259
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSequelRelationship |
P50867
|
FINISHED |
| Object | concludes original Matrix trilogy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: concludes original Matrix trilogy | Statement: [The Matrix Revolutions, hasSequelRelationship, concludes original Matrix trilogy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSequelRelationship Context triple: [The Matrix Revolutions, hasSequelRelationship, concludes original Matrix trilogy]
-
A.
hasSequelOrRelated
chosen
Indicates that one work follows, continues, or is otherwise narratively or thematically related to another work.
-
B.
hasSequel
Indicates that one work is followed by another work that continues its story, timeline, or thematic development.
-
C.
hasSequelInCanon
Indicates that a work has a subsequent work that continues its story within the officially recognized continuity.
-
D.
hasSequelNumber
Indicates that an entity is followed by another work in a series identified by a specific sequential number.
-
E.
hasSequelRumors
Indicates that there are rumors or unconfirmed reports suggesting a sequel exists or may be produced for the referenced work.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3454f739481909ff6c28331f0c0b9 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b352669f608190b3aa7030d8073e04 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b34f572efc8190bad1e5078cbcb75a |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:19 p.m.