Triple
T4322331
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | California Penutian languages |
E96547
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Penutian languages subgroup |
C15616
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Penutian languages subgroup Context triple: [California Penutian languages, instanceOf, Penutian languages subgroup]
-
A.
Austronesian subgroup
An Austronesian subgroup is a classification of related languages within the Austronesian language family that share common historical origins and linguistic features.
-
B.
Oto-Manguean language
An Oto-Manguean language is a member of a large, diverse family of indigenous Mesoamerican languages, primarily spoken in Mexico, characterized by complex tonal systems and significant grammatical and phonological variation.
-
C.
Banda languages
Banda languages are a group of closely related Ubangian languages spoken primarily in the Central African Republic and neighboring regions, characterized by shared phonological and grammatical features.
-
D.
Great Andamanese language
The Great Andamanese language is an endangered mixed language spoken by the indigenous Great Andamanese people of the Andaman Islands, combining elements from several original Andamanese languages with influences from Hindi and other contact languages.
-
E.
Misumalpan language
Misumalpan language is a small family of indigenous languages spoken primarily along the Atlantic coast of Nicaragua and neighboring regions, including Miskito, Sumo (Mayangna), and Matagalpan varieties.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b345422aac81909ddbadae437d122e |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:12 p.m.