Triple

T4307757
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Min E93996 entity
Predicate hasRomanizationSystem P23170 FINISHED
Object Hanyu Pinyin E175084 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hanyu Pinyin | Statement: [Min, hasRomanizationSystem, Hanyu Pinyin]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hanyu Pinyin
Context triple: [Min, hasRomanizationSystem, Hanyu Pinyin]
  • A. Hanyu Pinyin chosen
    Hanyu Pinyin is the official romanization system for Standard Mandarin Chinese, using the Latin alphabet to represent Chinese pronunciation.
  • B. Tongyong Pinyin
    Tongyong Pinyin is a romanization system for Mandarin Chinese that was once officially used in Taiwan as an alternative to Hanyu Pinyin.
  • C. Zhuyin
    Zhuyin is a phonetic writing system for transcribing the sounds of Mandarin Chinese, primarily used in Taiwan for teaching pronunciation and literacy.
  • D. Pe̍h-ōe-jī
    Pe̍h-ōe-jī is a Latin-based orthography developed by Western missionaries for writing Southern Min (Hokkien) and related Chinese dialects.
  • E. Taiwanese Romanization System
    The Taiwanese Romanization System is a standardized Latin-based orthography used to phonetically represent Taiwanese Hokkien.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3451886588190a3dd1305ea7c58dc completed March 12, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b350d2af088190ad7cb035d6e0f8c2 completed March 12, 2026, 11:48 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b5d07aede08190bbabc6a7b5a7dfb6 completed March 14, 2026, 9:17 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:11 p.m.