Triple
T4287210
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hérault |
E97297
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hérault River |
E238073
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hérault River | Statement: [Hérault, contains, Hérault River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hérault River Context triple: [Hérault, contains, Hérault River]
-
A.
Hérault River
chosen
The Hérault River is a river in southern France that flows through the Occitanie region before emptying into the Mediterranean Sea.
-
B.
Sorgue River
The Sorgue River is a picturesque waterway in southeastern France, known for its clear springs, historic waterwheels, and scenic Provençal towns along its banks.
-
C.
Corrèze River
The Corrèze River is a watercourse in south-central France that flows through the Corrèze department, including the town of Tulle, before joining the Vézère River.
-
D.
Ariège River
The Ariège River is a river in southwestern France that flows through the Pyrenees and the town of Foix before joining the Garonne.
-
E.
Aveyron River
The Aveyron River is a waterway in southern France known for flowing through scenic gorges and historic towns before joining the Tarn River.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3454595848190a0e6bbb6a2bea040 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b3505ef9fc81909c73e64bf77052ce |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:46 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bf7fbd0bc881908ba07edb75479b97 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:35 a.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:08 p.m.