Triple
T4281157
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sheffield plate |
E97151
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableRisk |
P16293
|
FINISHED |
| Object | overpolishing can expose copper core |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: overpolishing can expose copper core | Statement: [Sheffield plate, notableRisk, overpolishing can expose copper core]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableRisk Context triple: [Sheffield plate, notableRisk, overpolishing can expose copper core]
-
A.
notableSafety
Indicates that an entity is recognized for having significant safety characteristics, performance, or impact relative to others.
-
B.
riskType
Indicates the category or nature of risk associated with an entity, event, or relationship.
-
C.
riskFeature
Indicates that one entity possesses or exhibits a characteristic, condition, or attribute that increases the likelihood or severity of a negative outcome for another entity or situation.
-
D.
hasNotableHazard
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a significant risk, danger, or harmful condition that is noteworthy or exceptional.
-
E.
riskBasis
Indicates the underlying factor, condition, or rationale that forms the basis for assessing or assigning risk in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b34544be3c819084d1ab82d29f90c5 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b35037b654819087abbb5ea231eefd |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b347fc4c0c8190a7fcd814e27308a5 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:07 p.m.