Triple

T4279313
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject PL/Tcl E97111 entity
Predicate languageHandlerFunction P55180 FINISHED
Object pltcl_call_handler LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: pltcl_call_handler | Statement: [PL/Tcl, languageHandlerFunction, pltcl_call_handler]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageHandlerFunction
Context triple: [PL/Tcl, languageHandlerFunction, pltcl_call_handler]
  • A. handledLanguage
    Indicates that an entity has processed, used, or otherwise dealt with a particular language in some context.
  • B. languageProvision
    Indicates that one entity supplies, supports, or makes available a particular language (or set of languages) for use by another entity.
  • C. languageView
    Indicates a relationship where one entity views, interprets, or presents another entity through the lens of a particular language or linguistic perspective.
  • D. languageOfOperation
    Indicates the language in which an entity (such as a system, service, or process) primarily operates or functions.
  • E. languageName
    Indicates the specific name assigned to a language in the relationship.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b34544be3c819084d1ab82d29f90c5 completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b350367da48190b735deef9b5d2d2e completed March 12, 2026, 11:45 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b347faa45481908c19c29fb906dc92 completed March 12, 2026, 11:10 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69b34e0606488190baadf469a1afc3c2 completed March 12, 2026, 11:36 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:07 p.m.