Triple
T4276683
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ReDoc |
E97060
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsThemeCustomization |
P203
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [ReDoc, supportsThemeCustomization, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsThemeCustomization Context triple: [ReDoc, supportsThemeCustomization, true]
-
A.
supportsThemeOf
Indicates that one entity reinforces, aligns with, or contributes to the central theme expressed by another entity.
-
B.
hasPersonalThemes
Indicates that something (such as a work, message, or expression) involves themes that are personal, intimate, or directly related to an individual’s own experiences or inner life.
-
C.
customizableBy
Indicates that one entity can be modified, configured, or tailored in some way by another entity.
-
D.
supportsFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
-
E.
hasThemeConnection
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to another through a shared or related theme, topic, or conceptual focus.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b34544be3c819084d1ab82d29f90c5 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b3501d677481909e7416a1d2b0008c |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b347faa45481908c19c29fb906dc92 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:07 p.m.