Triple
T4271513
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Proto-Turkic |
E96950
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ancestor of Turkic languages |
C7978
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: ancestor of Turkic languages Context triple: [Proto-Turkic, instanceOf, ancestor of Turkic languages]
-
A.
Turkic language
A Turkic language is a member of a family of closely related languages spoken across a vast area from Eastern Europe and Anatolia through Central Asia to Siberia and Western China, characterized by agglutinative morphology, vowel harmony, and similar grammatical structures.
-
B.
branch of the Turkic languages
chosen
A branch of the Turkic languages is a subgroup of related Turkic languages that share a common historical origin, structural features, and vocabulary within the broader Turkic language family.
-
C.
Uralic language
A Uralic language is a member of the Uralic language family, originating in Northern Eurasia and characterized by features such as agglutinative morphology, extensive case systems, and vowel harmony, including languages like Finnish, Hungarian, and Estonian.
-
D.
Altaic language group (disputed)
The Altaic language group (disputed) is a proposed but widely contested macro-family that would link Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic, and sometimes Koreanic and Japonic languages under a common ancestral origin.
-
E.
Altaic language group (disputed)
The Altaic language group (disputed) is a proposed but widely contested macro-family that would link Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic, and sometimes Koreanic and Japonic languages based on shared structural and lexical features often argued to result from areal contact rather than common ancestry.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b34543f06c8190915ebb1a4574ffa9 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:07 p.m.