Triple
T4267665
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court |
E96863
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNotableCase |
P7437
|
FINISHED |
| Object | INS v. Chadha |
E27123
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: INS v. Chadha | Statement: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court, hasNotableCase, INS v. Chadha]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: INS v. Chadha Context triple: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court, hasNotableCase, INS v. Chadha]
-
A.
INS v. Chadha
chosen
INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
-
B.
Katzenbach v. Morgan
Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
-
C.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
D.
Chiafalo v. Washington
Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
-
E.
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. is a landmark 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed the president’s independent and plenary authority in conducting foreign affairs.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b34543f06c8190915ebb1a4574ffa9 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b34fce710481909d90ed4a3d150fde |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:44 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b5b79992a08190b614a89aa36cf674 |
completed | March 14, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:07 p.m.