Triple

T426543
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tommy Amaker E9619 entity
Predicate coachingSpecialty P13768 FINISHED
Object backcourt player development LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: backcourt player development | Statement: [Tommy Amaker, coachingSpecialty, backcourt player development]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coachingSpecialty
Context triple: [Tommy Amaker, coachingSpecialty, backcourt player development]
  • A. coachingTreeIncludes
    Indicates that one coach is part of, or derived from, another coach’s coaching lineage or mentorship hierarchy.
  • B. hasCoachedFor
    Indicates that one entity has served in a coaching role for another entity, such as a team, organization, or individual.
  • C. training
    Indicates that one entity is teaching, coaching, or otherwise helping another entity acquire or improve a skill, behavior, or capability.
  • D. offersDiscipline
    Indicates that one entity provides or makes available a particular field of study, training, or area of specialization to another entity.
  • E. coachOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as the coach (trainer or manager) of another entity, typically a person or team.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e801e1d48190b505d1dd336b52ac completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2eed691c4819092b7e57306114bbc completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2edd6736c81909a6ca549f77b4345 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:29 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2eeb93584819082f23eff13e17c4f completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:33 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m.