Triple

T425291
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject USB Mini-B E8193 entity
Predicate typicalCurrentLimit P10796 FINISHED
Object up to 500 mA in USB 2.0 host ports LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: up to 500 mA in USB 2.0 host ports | Statement: [USB Mini-B, typicalCurrentLimit, up to 500 mA in USB 2.0 host ports]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalCurrentLimit
Context triple: [USB Mini-B, typicalCurrentLimit, up to 500 mA in USB 2.0 host ports]
  • A. supportsMaximumCurrent
    Indicates that one entity is capable of handling or allowing a specified maximum electric current for another entity or connection.
  • B. maxCurrent chosen
    Indicates the maximum electric current that is allowed to flow through or be drawn by an entity under specified conditions.
  • C. supportsMaximumVoltage
    Indicates that an entity is capable of safely operating at or up to a specified maximum voltage level.
  • D. hasLimitation
    Indicates that an entity is subject to a constraint, restriction, or boundary that limits its scope, capability, or applicability.
  • E. typicalCapacity
    Indicates the usual or standard amount, volume, or capability that something is designed or expected to hold, handle, or perform under normal conditions.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7f1d1bc81909cf2dc9754a3c334 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2eed56ab481909eec289075496260 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2edd6736c81909a6ca549f77b4345 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:29 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m.