Triple
T4229808
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pepe San Román |
E94550
|
entity |
| Predicate | conflictTypeInvolved |
P1397
|
FINISHED |
| Object | covert invasion |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: covert invasion | Statement: [Pepe San Román, conflictTypeInvolved, covert invasion]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conflictTypeInvolved Context triple: [Pepe San Román, conflictTypeInvolved, covert invasion]
-
A.
conflictType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of conflict that characterizes the relationship or interaction between entities.
-
B.
conflictIn
Indicates that one entity is involved in, associated with, or occurs within a particular conflict or dispute.
-
C.
hasPartOfConflict
Indicates that one conflict includes another conflict as a constituent or subordinate part of it.
-
D.
conflictSpecific
Indicates a specific, concrete instance or type of conflict that exists between the related entities.
-
E.
conflictDescribedIn
Indicates that a particular conflict is documented, detailed, or discussed within a specified information source or description.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3453700a08190ae88792e3dc63207 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b34e61ccc081909b880baf1d6a0f24 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b347f3bd188190b0cd613e8a5c1683 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:05 p.m.