Triple
T422980
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Massasoit |
E8144
|
entity |
| Predicate | child |
P120
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Metacom |
E15773
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Metacom | Statement: [Massasoit, child, Metacom]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Metacom Context triple: [Massasoit, child, Metacom]
-
A.
Metacom
chosen
Metacom, also known as King Philip, was a 17th-century Wampanoag leader who led a major Native American resistance against English colonists in New England during King Philip's War.
-
B.
Pokanoket
Pokanoket was a principal Wampanoag village and political center in present-day New England, historically associated with the leadership of Massasoit and early contact with English colonists.
-
C.
Weetamoo
Weetamoo was a prominent 17th-century Wampanoag sachem (female leader) who played a key role in Native resistance during King Philip’s War in New England.
-
D.
Massasoit
Massasoit was the 17th-century Wampanoag leader who forged a crucial peace alliance with the Pilgrims at Plymouth Colony.
-
E.
Wôpanâak
Wôpanâak is the Indigenous Algonquian language of the Wampanoag people of southeastern New England, currently undergoing revitalization after centuries of dormancy.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7f1d1bc81909cf2dc9754a3c334 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2eec200648190bcb9f1b98c8e9cdf |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:33 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a4366960dc81908708bd168aa3a278 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 12:51 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m.