Triple
T4229615
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Washington v. Davis |
E94545
|
entity |
| Predicate | impactOnDoctrine |
P39579
|
FINISHED |
| Object | established that disparate impact alone does not violate equal protection without proof of discriminatory intent |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: established that disparate impact alone does not violate equal protection without proof of discriminatory intent | Statement: [Washington v. Davis, impactOnDoctrine, established that disparate impact alone does not violate equal protection without proof of discriminatory intent]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: impactOnDoctrine Context triple: [Washington v. Davis, impactOnDoctrine, established that disparate impact alone does not violate equal protection without proof of discriminatory intent]
-
A.
legalDoctrineInfluenced
Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
-
B.
doctrinalInfluenceOn
Indicates that one doctrine has influenced, shaped, or contributed to the development of another doctrine.
-
C.
impactOnLaw
chosen
Indicates the effect or influence that one entity, event, or action has on laws, legal rules, or the legal system.
-
D.
doctrineOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity is the doctrinal teaching, principle, or belief system associated with, derived from, or formally held by another entity.
-
E.
courtInfluence
Indicates that one party exerts or holds influence over decisions, outcomes, or behavior within a court or judicial setting.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3453700a08190ae88792e3dc63207 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b34e61ccc081909b880baf1d6a0f24 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b347f3bd188190b0cd613e8a5c1683 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:05 p.m.