Triple
T4221014
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota |
E94338
|
entity |
| Predicate | primaryCourt |
P9881
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States District Court for the District of Minnesota |
E78670
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota | Statement: [United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota, primaryCourt, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota Context triple: [United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota, primaryCourt, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota]
-
A.
United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
chosen
The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota is a federal trial court with jurisdiction over civil and criminal cases arising under federal law within the state of Minnesota.
-
B.
United States District Court for the District of North Dakota
The United States District Court for the District of North Dakota is a federal trial court with jurisdiction over civil and criminal cases arising under federal law within the state of North Dakota.
-
C.
United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa is a federal trial court with jurisdiction over civil and criminal cases arising in the northern region of Iowa.
-
D.
United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa is a federal trial court with jurisdiction over civil and criminal cases arising in the southern region of the state of Iowa.
-
E.
United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
The United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin is a federal trial court with jurisdiction over federal civil and criminal cases arising in the western region of Wisconsin.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: primaryCourt Context triple: [United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota, primaryCourt, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota]
-
A.
trialCourt
chosen
Indicates that a legal matter, decision, or proceeding is associated with, handled by, or occurring in a court of first instance (the trial-level court).
-
B.
parentCourt
Indicates that one court is hierarchically above and has authority over another court within a judicial system.
-
C.
lowerCourt
Indicates that one court holds a subordinate or inferior position in the judicial hierarchy relative to another court.
-
D.
highestTrialCourtOf
Indicates that one entity serves as the supreme or final-level trial court within the judicial hierarchy of another entity (such as a jurisdiction or legal system).
-
E.
highCourtSeat
Indicates that a location serves as the official seat or headquarters of a high court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3451997e08190851db4a9a588837d |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b34e4bf6088190926b982039a12079 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:37 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b5a858a5b08190990a896265ac9725 |
completed | March 14, 2026, 6:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b347f1d7b48190bd8974c03c7dc937 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:04 p.m.