Triple
T418406
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 |
E8044
|
entity |
| Predicate | yearDeclaredUnconstitutional |
P14664
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1936 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1936 | Statement: [Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933, yearDeclaredUnconstitutional, 1936]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: yearDeclaredUnconstitutional Context triple: [Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933, yearDeclaredUnconstitutional, 1936]
-
A.
declaredUnconstitutionalInCase
Indicates that a law, policy, or action was ruled unconstitutional in a specific legal case.
-
B.
constitutionalChallenge
Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
-
C.
reasonUnconstitutional
Indicates that something is deemed to violate a constitution and is therefore considered legally unconstitutional.
-
D.
constitutionalNumber
Indicates that an entity has a specific number or count defined or constrained by a constitution or foundational governing document.
-
E.
challengedStatute
Indicates that a particular statute or law is being contested, questioned, or disputed, typically in a legal or constitutional proceeding.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7f1d1bc81909cf2dc9754a3c334 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2eebde1d881908fb212bfba9d7c67 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2edd1ca148190a66bd8c5aad867d5 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:29 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2eeb8545c8190a2b8517e7ed5b92e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:33 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m.