Triple
T41775
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | South Acton |
E825
|
entity |
| Predicate | reconstructed |
P529
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2010s |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2010s | Statement: [South Acton, reconstructed, 2010s]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reconstructed Context triple: [South Acton, reconstructed, 2010s]
-
A.
reconstructedAfter
chosen
Indicates that one entity has been rebuilt, restored, or reassembled following the occurrence or existence of another entity or event.
-
B.
rebuiltFor
Indicates that one entity has been reconstructed, renovated, or modified specifically to serve the needs, purposes, or use of another entity.
-
C.
reconstructedWithAidProgram
Indicates that an entity was rebuilt or restored through the support or resources provided by an aid program.
-
D.
reorganized
Indicates that an entity has changed the structure, order, or arrangement of another entity or set of entities from a previous configuration.
-
E.
reorganizedAs
Indicates that an existing entity has been restructured or reconfigured into a new organizational form or arrangement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a247a8f6c08190bac804906d62ed5a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24db9527c8190816b6b25c88cb2f4 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ab8a8908190beec6da6694dd4c9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:46 a.m.