Triple
T4157953
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Parerga and Paralipomena |
E91460
|
entity |
| Predicate | philosophicalStyle |
P31332
|
FINISHED |
| Object | essayistic |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: essayistic | Statement: [Parerga and Paralipomena, philosophicalStyle, essayistic]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: philosophicalStyle Context triple: [Parerga and Paralipomena, philosophicalStyle, essayistic]
-
A.
philosophicalGenre
chosen
Indicates that one entity is classified as a philosophical genre or category of philosophical work to which the other entity belongs.
-
B.
philosophicalTheme
Indicates that a work, idea, or discourse centrally involves or explores a particular philosophical concept, question, or line of thought.
-
C.
philosophicalMethod
Indicates the method, approach, or technique used in conducting philosophical inquiry or reasoning.
-
D.
philosophicalStatus
Indicates the philosophical position, stance, or classification attributed to an entity within a given conceptual or theoretical framework.
-
E.
philosophicalContributor
Indicates that one entity has made a significant contribution to the philosophical work, ideas, or discourse associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed9626ebc8190a39de631788bea3e |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69af0321eee88190871c1d4bf44a5007 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69af018dc90c8190a754b1bfbc802e80 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:44 p.m.