Triple
T4157565
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | A Theory of Justice |
E91452
|
entity |
| Predicate | proposesPrinciple |
P11867
|
FINISHED |
| Object | equal basic liberties for all persons |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: equal basic liberties for all persons | Statement: [A Theory of Justice, proposesPrinciple, equal basic liberties for all persons]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposesPrinciple Context triple: [A Theory of Justice, proposesPrinciple, equal basic liberties for all persons]
-
A.
establishesPrinciple
chosen
Indicates that an entity formulates, defines, or sets forth a foundational rule, guideline, or standard that others are expected to follow or build upon.
-
B.
usesPrinciple
Indicates that one entity applies, relies on, or is based upon a particular principle in its functioning, reasoning, or design.
-
C.
implementsPrinciple
Indicates that an entity applies, follows, or puts into practice a specified principle in its design, behavior, or operation.
-
D.
supportsPrinciple
Indicates that one entity endorses, upholds, or actively backs a particular principle or doctrine.
-
E.
recognizesPrinciple
Indicates that an entity acknowledges the validity, authority, or applicability of a particular principle.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed9626ebc8190a39de631788bea3e |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69af0321eee88190871c1d4bf44a5007 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69af018dc90c8190a754b1bfbc802e80 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:44 p.m.