Triple

T415270
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Khoisan languages E9577 entity
Predicate classificationDebate P1783 FINISHED
Object genetic relationships among subgroups are controversial LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: genetic relationships among subgroups are controversial | Statement: [Khoisan languages, classificationDebate, genetic relationships among subgroups are controversial]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: classificationDebate
Context triple: [Khoisan languages, classificationDebate, genetic relationships among subgroups are controversial]
  • A. languageOfDebate
    Indicates that a specified language is the one used for conducting a particular debate.
  • B. constitutionalDebate
    Indicates a relationship where parties are engaged in discussing, disputing, or interpreting the meaning, scope, or application of a constitution.
  • C. hasDebate
    Indicates that there is a formal discussion or argument between entities, typically presenting opposing viewpoints on a topic.
  • D. controversy chosen
    Indicates a situation in which there is active disagreement, dispute, or public debate between parties over a particular issue, action, or claim.
  • E. politicalRationale
    Indicates the reasoning, justification, or strategic considerations underlying a political decision, stance, or action.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e80111fc8190961d5b7c6154123f completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2eebde1d881908fb212bfba9d7c67 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:33 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2edcff4688190809d83d112ff25a5 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:29 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:09 p.m.