Triple
T4149339
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gitxsan |
E89864
|
entity |
| Predicate | involvedInCase |
P17092
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Delgamuukw v. British Columbia
Delgamuukw v. British Columbia is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of Canada decision that fundamentally defined and affirmed the nature, scope, and constitutional protection of Aboriginal title in Canada.
|
E417628
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Delgamuukw v. British Columbia | Statement: [Gitxsan, involvedInCase, Delgamuukw v. British Columbia]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Delgamuukw v. British Columbia Context triple: [Gitxsan, involvedInCase, Delgamuukw v. British Columbia]
-
A.
Nisga’a Final Agreement
The Nisga’a Final Agreement is a landmark modern treaty in British Columbia that recognizes Nisga’a self-government and land rights, serving as a key model for contemporary Indigenous–Crown agreements in Canada.
-
B.
Inuvialuit Final Agreement
The Inuvialuit Final Agreement is a comprehensive land claims settlement between the Inuvialuit and the Government of Canada that defines Inuvialuit rights to land, resources, and self-governance in the western Canadian Arctic.
-
C.
Labrador Inuit Land Claims Agreement
The Labrador Inuit Land Claims Agreement is a comprehensive modern treaty that recognizes the self-government and land rights of the Inuit of northern Labrador, leading to the creation of the Nunatsiavut Government.
-
D.
Tsawwassen First Nation
Tsawwassen First Nation is an Indigenous Coast Salish community located in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia, Canada, known for its modern treaty and self-governing status.
-
E.
Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
Mabo v Queensland (No 2) is a landmark 1992 High Court of Australia decision that recognized native title and overturned the doctrine of terra nullius in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Delgamuukw v. British Columbia Triple: [Gitxsan, involvedInCase, Delgamuukw v. British Columbia]
Generated description
Delgamuukw v. British Columbia is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of Canada decision that fundamentally defined and affirmed the nature, scope, and constitutional protection of Aboriginal title in Canada.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Delgamuukw v. British Columbia Target entity description: Delgamuukw v. British Columbia is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of Canada decision that fundamentally defined and affirmed the nature, scope, and constitutional protection of Aboriginal title in Canada.
-
A.
Nisga’a Final Agreement
The Nisga’a Final Agreement is a landmark modern treaty in British Columbia that recognizes Nisga’a self-government and land rights, serving as a key model for contemporary Indigenous–Crown agreements in Canada.
-
B.
Inuvialuit Final Agreement
The Inuvialuit Final Agreement is a comprehensive land claims settlement between the Inuvialuit and the Government of Canada that defines Inuvialuit rights to land, resources, and self-governance in the western Canadian Arctic.
-
C.
Labrador Inuit Land Claims Agreement
The Labrador Inuit Land Claims Agreement is a comprehensive modern treaty that recognizes the self-government and land rights of the Inuit of northern Labrador, leading to the creation of the Nunatsiavut Government.
-
D.
Tsawwassen First Nation
Tsawwassen First Nation is an Indigenous Coast Salish community located in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia, Canada, known for its modern treaty and self-governing status.
-
E.
Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
Mabo v Queensland (No 2) is a landmark 1992 High Court of Australia decision that recognized native title and overturned the doctrine of terra nullius in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: involvedInCase Context triple: [Gitxsan, involvedInCase, Delgamuukw v. British Columbia]
-
A.
associatedCourtCase
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to, or involved in, a particular court case.
-
B.
formerlyInvolved
Indicates that an entity previously participated in or was associated with another entity or activity, but is no longer involved.
-
C.
oftenInvolvedWith
Indicates that one entity frequently participates in or is commonly associated with activities, events, or situations involving another entity.
-
D.
hasMemberInvolvedIn
Indicates that a group or collective entity has at least one of its members participating in or engaged with a specified activity, event, or situation.
-
E.
disputeInvolves
Indicates that a particular dispute includes or concerns the specified entities as participants or parties to the conflict.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed95a59a881909b26e70b42c6811a |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69af033ef6648190adde17f943d89c78 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:28 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b57f34c748819093d03ccddd3e1f75 |
completed | March 14, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69b57f9e42c88190b516bf8dca7b2efc |
completed | March 14, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69b58028e7108190a6c92fc9ea300f9e |
completed | March 14, 2026, 3:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69af018c101081909070da5b11e5eb3d |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:43 p.m.