Triple

T414855
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject New Keynesian economics E9569 entity
Predicate justifiesPolicy P11285 FINISHED
Object active stabilization policy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: active stabilization policy | Statement: [New Keynesian economics, justifiesPolicy, active stabilization policy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: justifiesPolicy
Context triple: [New Keynesian economics, justifiesPolicy, active stabilization policy]
  • A. justification chosen
    Indicates that one entity provides a reason, explanation, or supporting argument for the existence, validity, or appropriateness of another entity or claim.
  • B. justified
    Indicates that an action, belief, or decision is supported by sufficient reasons or evidence to be considered reasonable or warranted.
  • C. supportsPolicy
    Indicates that one entity endorses, backs, or is in favor of a particular policy or set of policies.
  • D. governingPolicy
    Indicates that one entity serves as the authoritative policy or set of rules that directs, constrains, or regulates the behavior, operation, or decisions of another entity.
  • E. policyStance
    Indicates the position or viewpoint an entity holds regarding a specific policy or set of policies.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e80111fc8190961d5b7c6154123f completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2eebde1d881908fb212bfba9d7c67 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:33 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2edcff4688190809d83d112ff25a5 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:29 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:09 p.m.