Triple
T4141286
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sm’álgyax |
E89276
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tsimshianic language |
C15018
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Tsimshianic language Context triple: [Sm’álgyax, instanceOf, Tsimshianic language]
-
A.
Hokan language
Hokan language is a proposed but controversial grouping of several Native American language families and isolates of western North America, hypothesized to share a distant common ancestor.
-
B.
Numic language
A Numic language is any member of a branch of the Uto-Aztecan language family spoken traditionally by Indigenous peoples of the Great Basin and surrounding regions of the western United States, including languages such as Northern Paiute, Shoshoni, and Comanche.
-
C.
Inuit language
Inuit language is a group of closely related Indigenous languages spoken across the Arctic regions of Alaska, Canada, and Greenland, characterized by polysynthetic word formation and rich expression of environmental and cultural concepts.
-
D.
Algonquian language
An Algonquian language is any member of a family of Indigenous languages of North America, historically spoken from the Atlantic coast to the Great Plains and characterized by complex morphology and polysynthetic structure.
-
E.
Caddoan language
A Caddoan language is any member of a small family of Indigenous languages of the central United States, historically spoken by Caddo, Wichita, Pawnee, and related peoples, characterized by complex verb morphology and now mostly endangered or extinct.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed95785788190ae75bcf0cd1cafdf |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:43 p.m.