Triple
T412415
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | USSR–Cuba military alliance |
E9517
|
entity |
| Predicate | includedSupportType |
P936
|
FINISHED |
| Object | military aid |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: military aid | Statement: [USSR–Cuba military alliance, includedSupportType, military aid]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includedSupportType Context triple: [USSR–Cuba military alliance, includedSupportType, military aid]
-
A.
typeOfSupport
chosen
Indicates the kind or category of assistance, help, or backing provided in a given context.
-
B.
isSupportedBy
Indicates that an entity is upheld, sustained, or enabled by another entity, which provides necessary assistance, resources, or justification.
-
C.
supportsAccountType
Indicates that one entity is compatible with, or able to operate for, a specified type or category of account.
-
D.
supportsProjectType
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, accommodating, or being compatible with a specified type of project.
-
E.
featuresSupporter
Indicates that one entity serves as a supporter, advocate, or promoter of another entity or its cause.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e80111fc8190961d5b7c6154123f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ecdafa2481908111accc918ff2e8 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e9749234819084b0ce94faabd0b1 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:09 p.m.