Triple
T4116509
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Maryland v. Wirtz |
E90303
|
entity |
| Predicate | tenthAmendmentHolding |
P54733
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Court rejected Tenth Amendment challenge to FLSA coverage in this context |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Court rejected Tenth Amendment challenge to FLSA coverage in this context | Statement: [Maryland v. Wirtz, tenthAmendmentHolding, Court rejected Tenth Amendment challenge to FLSA coverage in this context]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: tenthAmendmentHolding Context triple: [Maryland v. Wirtz, tenthAmendmentHolding, Court rejected Tenth Amendment challenge to FLSA coverage in this context]
-
A.
constitutionalBasisOfHolding
Indicates that one legal holding is grounded in, justified by, or derived from a specific constitutional provision or principle.
-
B.
constitutionalClause
Indicates that one entity is a specific clause or provision contained within a constitution that governs or constrains another entity.
-
C.
supremacyClause
Indicates that one legal authority, rule, or agreement takes precedence over and invalidates conflicting lower-level laws or provisions.
-
D.
subjectToConstitution
Indicates that an entity is governed, constrained, or regulated by the rules and principles of a specific constitution.
-
E.
constitutionalLimit
Indicates that there is a restriction or boundary imposed by a constitution on the powers, actions, or rights involved in the relationship.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed95c080881908125e30c5dcdc6f8 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69af03d7240c8190a64dcbc669772808 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69af0183eb84819087d7184de28f5514 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69af03d5cce88190ad53bc6cfe10b21e |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:41 p.m.