Triple

T4114838
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Symphony No. 5 (Harbison) E90265 entity
Predicate usesTextLanguage P18209 FINISHED
Object English LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English | Statement: [Symphony No. 5 (Harbison), usesTextLanguage, English]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesTextLanguage
Context triple: [Symphony No. 5 (Harbison), usesTextLanguage, English]
  • A. isLanguageOf
    Indicates that a particular language is used as the official or primary language associated with a given entity (such as a person, document, or region).
  • B. languageIndependence
    Indicates that a concept, method, or representation does not depend on any specific programming or natural language and can be applied uniformly across different languages.
  • C. testLanguage
    Indicates that an entity uses or is associated with a particular language for testing or evaluation purposes.
  • D. languageUse chosen
    Indicates the language or languages an entity uses for communication, expression, or interaction.
  • E. languageProvision
    Indicates that one entity supplies, supports, or makes available a particular language (or set of languages) for use by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed95c080881908125e30c5dcdc6f8 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69af03d7240c8190a64dcbc669772808 completed March 9, 2026, 5:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69af0183eb84819087d7184de28f5514 completed March 9, 2026, 5:21 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:41 p.m.